Legal Opinion

Baxter v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 3, 1952No. 49994PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitakek, Judge

Plaintiff sues for the salary he lost because of his alleged illegal separation from the service. His case is before us on motions for summary judgment by both parties.

It is manifest that plaintiff’s motion cannot be granted. The defendant controverts several facts asserted by plaintiff, the establishment of which is necessary to a recovery. In such case, of course, a motion for summary judgment cannot be granted.

One ground of defendant’s motion is that plaintiff’s suit is barred by laches. Plaintiff has been diligent, indeed assiduous, in bringing his grievance to the attention of the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gersten v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. O'Brien v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  3. Henry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  4. Baxter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  5. Ness Investment Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API