Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 13, 2014No. 05-13-00206-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice LEWIS.

This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s granting of a temporary in*444junction. The injunction granted relief to both Colin Richardson, who brought shareholder derivative claims on behalf of Sun River Energy, Inc. (“Sun River”), and Steven R. Henson, who brought individual claims below. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse the trial court’s Order Granting Temporary Injunction (the “Order”) and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.

Background

Sun River is an oil and gas company. Its primary asset is a significant mineral…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. MoralesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Frey v. DeCordova Bend Estates Owners Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Harbor Perfusion, Inc. v. Floyd, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sargeant v. Al SalehCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Dimock Operating Company, and Joe W. Dimock, D/B/A Dimock Petroleum v. Sutherland Energy Co., LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In Re Marty Berry and Axis Midstream Holdings, LLC v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025
  4. In Re Marty Berry and Axis Midstream Holdings, LLC v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025
  5. Janos Farkas v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. And Brice, Vander Linden & Wernick, P.C., N/K/A Buckley Madole, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API