Legal Opinion
Harbor Perfusion, Inc. v. Floyd
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided March 29, 2001No. 13-00-679-CVPublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice RODRIGUEZ.
This is an accelerated, interlocutory appeal from a temporary injunction prohibiting Harbor Perfusion, Inc., (Harbor) from enforcing a covenant not to compete against Donald G. Floyd. See Tex.Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(4) (Vernon Supp.2001); Tex.R.App.P. 28.1. Harbor challenges the temporary injunction by four issues. We reverse and remand.
Floyd is a cardiopulmonary clinical per-fusionist, which is a person who operates heart and lung machines as well as auto-transfusion devices during surgery. In 1985, Floyd and two other perfusionists formed a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Walling v. MetcalfeTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HealTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Republican Party of Texas v. DietzTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Sabine Offshore Service, Inc. v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Super Starr International, LLC v. Fresh Tex Produce, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- EMSL Analytical, Inc. v. Younker, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Lavigne v. HolderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- London Market Insurers v. American Home Assurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- Llanes v. Davila, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.