Memphis Fertilizer Co. v. Small
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney
This is a 'Workmen’s Compensation suit instituted by an alleged common-law wife and her six-year-old daughter. The trial court held that the wife was entitled to no recovery, but decreed that the child should be paid $5 per week for four hundred weeks.
Roosevelt Small, while'in the employ of the Fertilizer Company, received injuries resulting* in his death. The only question involved is do the petitioners come within the provisions of the act?
The facts, as found by the tidal court, are as follows:
“I find that Roosevelt Small and Beatrice were never married, but had lived together for eleven…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson Coffee Co. v. McDonaldTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
- Portin v. PortinTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Armstrong v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Kinnard v. Tennessee Chemical Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Cherokee Brick Co. v. BishopTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schurler v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Lunceford v. Fegles Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Wilmoth v. Phoenix Utility Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- Rogers v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.