Legal Opinion

Memphis Fertilizer Co. v. Small

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

This is a 'Workmen’s Compensation suit instituted by an alleged common-law wife and her six-year-old daughter. The trial court held that the wife was entitled to no recovery, but decreed that the child should be paid $5 per week for four hundred weeks.

Roosevelt Small, while'in the employ of the Fertilizer Company, received injuries resulting* in his death. The only question involved is do the petitioners come within the provisions of the act?

The facts, as found by the tidal court, are as follows:

“I find that Roosevelt Small and Beatrice were never married, but had lived together for eleven…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson Coffee Co. v. McDonaldTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Portin v. PortinTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Armstrong v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Kinnard v. Tennessee Chemical Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Cherokee Brick Co. v. BishopTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schurler v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Lunceford v. Fegles Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Wilmoth v. Phoenix Utility Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Rogers v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API