Legal Opinion

Wilmoth v. Phoenix Utility Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1934PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

Parties on both sides of this compensation case appeal from the decree of the chancellor. The employing company concedes liability for compensation to the widow of 30 per cent, of the deceased employee’s average weekly wages. Claims were made for a 10 per cent, allowance to an infant ward of the deceased, and for an additional 10 per cent, allowance to a mother-in-law, both alleged to be dependents. The chancellor allowed the first claim and denied the latter. A further controversy is presented as to the exact amount of the average wages of the deceased.

1. The child, four years old on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portin v. PortinTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Kinnard v. Tennessee Chemical Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. White v. the Pinkerton Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Memphis Fertilizer Co. v. SmallTennessee Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mack Coal Company v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  2. Carter v. Victor Chemical WorksTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Harris v. SuggsMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Sweeton v. Tennessee Consol. Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  5. New Jellico Coal Co. v. KennerTennessee Supreme Court · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API