City of Enterprise v. State
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
The issues presented by this appeal concern primarily the validity of 1933 Session Laws, chapter 433, as amended by 1933 Session Laws,' second special session, chapter 62. To the City of Enterprise, which instituted this proceeding as petitioner, we shall refer as the plaintiff, and to the defendants, which are the State, the State Bond Commission (1935 Oregon Code Supplement, § 68-501), the State Treasurer, and the three individual owners of securities issued by the plaintiff, as the defendants. The State owns bonds issued by the City of Enterprise which are in the custody of its treasurer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Springer v. Government of Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Meriwether v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- O'Donoghue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Searle v. YensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Hourigan v. Township of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Galloway v. TruesdellNevada Supreme Court · 1967
- Boyle v. City of BendOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Del Papa v. SteffenNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Burke v. Clark, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1952
- Family Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Paradise Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.