Legal Opinion
Langenohl v. Spearen, Preston & Burrows
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 3, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
22 N.J. Super. 392 (1952)
92 A.2d 75
FRED LANGENOHL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
SPEAREN, PRESTON & BURROWS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 29, 1952.
Decided November 3, 1952.
Before Judges FREUND, STANTON and CONLON.
Mr. Russell Fleming argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. St. Elmo Ferrara, attorney for petitioner-appellant).
Mr. James J. Skeffington argued the cause for the respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by STANTON, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).
This is an appeal from the dismissal of a petition for workmen's compensation.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Furferi v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Sigley v. Marathon Razor Blade Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Savitt v. L. & F. Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- J. W. Ferguson Co. v. SeamanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Savitt v. L. & F. Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Buzza v. General Motors Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Minardi v. Pacific Airmotive Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Staudter v. ElterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Howard Savings Institution v. QuatraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Gianforte v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.