Legal Opinion
Gianforte v. Crucible Steel Co. of America
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 11, 1953PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
25 N.J. Super. 183 (1953)
95 A.2d 632
DOMINICK GIANFORTE, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,
v.
CRUCIBLE STEEL CO. OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Hudson County Court Law Division.
Decided March 11, 1953.
Messrs. Roskein & Laird (Mr. John A. Laird appearing), attorneys for the petitioner-appellee.
Messrs. Cox & Walburg (Mr. Arthur F. Mead appearing), attorney for the respondent-appellant.
DUFFY, J.C.C.
This is an appeal by respondent from an adverse judgment in the Workmen's Compensation Division. The matter is before me on such appeal under an agreed stipulation of facts consented to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Oldfield v. New Jersey Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Frelinghuysen v. Town of MorristownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Nichols v. Board of Education, Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- J. W. Ferguson Co. v. SeamanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Savitt v. L. & F. Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dewberry v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1978
- McAllister v. Bd. of Ed., KearnyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Chambers v. NunezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Cruz v. Central Jersey Landscaping, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007