Legal Opinion
Minardi v. Pacific Airmotive Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 29, 1957PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
43 N.J. Super. 460 (1957)
129 A.2d 51
BART MINARDI, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
PACIFIC AIRMOTIVE CORP., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Civil Action
Superior Court of New Jersey, Union County Court, Law Division.
Decided January 29, 1957.
Mr. William D. Mungle, attorney for petitioner-appellant.
Mr. Isidor Kalisch, attorney for respondent-respondent.
FELLER, J.C.C.
This is a workmen's compensation appeal. The petition was dismissed in the bureau and the petitioner appeals.
Deputy Director Medinets determined that the petitioner failed to give notice to the respondent within 48 hours of the occurrence of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brandon v. Board of Commissioners of MontclairSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Brandon v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Brown's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Esposito v. Marlin-Rockwell CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Montell v. OrndorffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Buzza v. General Motors Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Corrier v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Salerno v. McGraw-Edison IndustriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Montell v. OrndorffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.