Large v. Fremont County, Wyo.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
We are called upon in this appeal to decide what level of deference — if any— must be afforded to a local governmental entity’s proffered plan to remedy an adjudged violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (“Section 2”), when that proposed remedy unnecessarily conflicts with state law. We believe that when such plans in effectuating their remedial purposes do not adhere as closely as possible to the contours of the governing state law, they are not eligible for the deference customarily afforded legislative plans. Consequently, in this…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Navajo Nation v. San Juan CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Harte v. Board Comm'rs Cnty of JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Covington v. North CarolinaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2018
- Joseph Thomas v. Phil BryantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. DeleonDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.