Legal Opinion

Miller v. E.W. Smith Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1983No. Civ. A. 83-1032PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BECHTLE, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiffs, Ronald and Mary Miller, assert claims against defendants, E.W. Smith Co. (“Smith”), Gruntal & Co. (“Gruntal”), and William Spiropoulos, under the federal securities laws, rules established by the National Association of Securities Dealers, and state tort and contract law. Presently before the court is the motion of defendants Smith and Gruntal to dismiss counts III and IY of the amended complaint, for severance of the state law claims, and for a stay of arbitration on the state law claims until conclusion of the federal…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  5. Regina (Rega) Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., and Sydney TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nasdaq Omx Phlx, Inc. v. Pennmont SecuritiesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Daniel Boone Area School Dist. v. Lehman Brothers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. After Six, Inc. v. Abraham Zion Corp. (In Re After Six, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Kinsey v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Hallo v. FloreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API