Legal Opinion
Kinsey v. Bradley
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 24, 1989No. 9085-0-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
Discretionary review was granted to review an order denying a motion by defendants Shearson American Express and the Bradleys to compel arbitration of the claims alleged against them by Stephen and Dawn Kinsey. The motion was denied on the basis Shearson and its employee, Mr. Bradley (hereinafter Shearson), had waived its right to arbitrate the claims.
In July 1980 the Kinseys opened a commodities account with Shearson and executed a customer agreement containing a provision for arbitrating "[a]ny controversy arising out of or relating to . . . transactions" between the parties. On April…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,406 R. Stockton Rush, III v. Oppenheimer & Co., and Scott SeskisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Adler v. Fred Lind ManorWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- NACHES VLY. SCH. DIST. v. CruzenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Naches Valley School District No. JT3 v. CruzenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Steele v. LundgrenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Gordon Schuster v. Prestige Senior Management LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.