Legal Opinion
Bernz v. Schaefer
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 6, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity. Suit by Otto Bernz against Frederick J. Schaefer and Emil Beyer. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
CROSS, District Judge.
The hill of complaint as, originally filed was based upon two patents, both issued to the complainant, one No. 937,757 on October 26, 1909, the other No. 955,313 on April 19, 1910. Both of them related to improvements in air pumps for blow-torches. Subsequently, by stipulation of counsel, patent No. 955,313 was withdrawn from consideration, and the cause came to final hearing as if the bill, answer, replication, and proofs related to patent No. 937,757 only.
The objects of the invention as stated in the specification are as follows :
“The objects of the invention are to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- National Cash Register Co. v. American Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1892
- Howard v. Detroit Stove WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Standard Caster & Wheel Co. v. Caster Socket Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Dempster Mill Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kurtz v. Belle Hat Lining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Laclede Christy Clay Products Co. v. City of St. LouisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1921
- Bernz v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
- Standard Stoker Co. v. Berkley Mach. Works & Foundry Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1938