Legal Opinion

Howard v. Detroit Stove Works

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 13, 1893No. 64PublishedCited by 48 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP MICHIGAN. In equity, for the infringement of letters patent. Decree dismissing the bill, from which complainants appealed. The. ■ case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

This suit was brought by appellants’ testator, Philo D. Beckwith, against the appellee for the alleged infringement of three letters patent, viz.: No. 123,142, issued January 30,1872; No. 135,621, issued February 11, 1873-; and No. 206,074, issued July 16, 1878, all for improvements in heating stoves. The defences set up and interposed were that the patents were all void for want of novelty and patentable invention. Pending the suit the patentee died, and the Cause was revived and proceeded in the name of his executors. The court below dismissed the bill and complainants appeal to this court…

2Cited by48 opinions

  1. Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. The Incandescent Lamp PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Standard Caster & Wheel Co. v. Caster Socket Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  4. Welsh Manufacturing Company v. Sunware Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  5. Pyle Nat. Co. v. LewinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API