Albonsky v. Banaitis
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The plaintiff sues to recover a commission for having procured the sale of defendant’s house under his employment as a real-estate broker. The sale of defendant’s house was made. Plaintiff’s “right to the commission is dependent upon the concurrence of two conditions: (1) the creation either expressly or impliedly of an agency employment to effect a sale, and (2) the execution of the terms of the employment to the extent of procuring a customer ready, able and willing to buy upon the terms prescribed by the owner.” Commander v. Lawler, 94 Conn. 125, 126, 108 Atl. 537. The employment of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Murphy v. LinskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Commander v. LawlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morosini v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Crane v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- State v. WymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Deutsch v. LabonneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930