Legal Opinion

Barrett v. King

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1916No. Appeal, No. 124PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 124, April T., 1916, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Armstrong Co., Dec. T., 1915, No. 195, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Edward E. Barrett, et al., trading as Barrett & Llewellyn, v. E. S. King, et al. Assumpsit to recover commissions for the sale of real estate. Before King, P. J. ' The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for |200. Defendant appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 124, April T., 1916, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Armstrong Co., Dec. T., 1915, No. 195, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Edward E. Barrett, et al., trading as Barrett & Llewellyn, v. E. S. King, et al. Assumpsit to recover commissions for the sale of real estate. Before King, P. J. ' The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for |200. Defendant appealed. Error assigned, among others, was in refusing binding instructions for defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Williams, J.,

The plaintiffs brought suit to recover a commission for the sale of real _ estate. A written contract was made, signed by “Edw. S. King, Adm. Est. Addison King.” The signer and his brother, Walter King (who had authorized Edward to act for him), were the owners of the property, subject to their mother’s dower and a mortgage which had been placed upon this and other property by the administrator under, authority of the Orphans’ Court. The agreement of agency, inter alia, provides for the payment to the plaintiffs, as a commission, of such sum as they may be able to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Liederkranz Singing Society v. Turn-VereinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  2. Phipps v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  3. Estate of ClaghornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Fehlinger v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  5. Clendenon v. PancoastSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mercer v. Santa Lucia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1952
  2. Veech v. Trustees of Trinity Episcopal Church, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1922
  3. Arnheim, Inc. v. Sunray Laundry, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1950
  4. Shenango Pottery Workers Ass'n v. Crawford, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API