Legal Opinion

Fehlinger v. Wood

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1890No. 261PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL BY DEPENDANT PROM THE COURT OP COMMON PLEAS OP LUZERNE COUNTY. No. 261 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 274. October Term 1885, C. P. On July 2,1885, S. H. Sturdevant and W. F. Goff, trading as Sturdevant & Goff, brought assumpsit against John G. Wood. The defendant pleaded non-assumpsit, payment with leave, etc.

Read the full summary

APPEAL BY DEPENDANT PROM THE COURT OP COMMON PLEAS OP LUZERNE COUNTY. No. 261 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 274. October Term 1885, C. P. On July 2,1885, S. H. Sturdevant and W. F. Goff, trading as Sturdevant & Goff, brought assumpsit against John G. Wood. The defendant pleaded non-assumpsit, payment with leave, etc. On March 8, 1886, the record was amended by substituting for plaintiffs, “ William Fehlinger, to use of Sturdevant & Goff,” and subsequently by agreement of counsel the cause was referred to Mr. J. D. Coons, as referee, “ under the act of March 25,1870 [perhaps P.…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curta m :

This case has been sufficiently discussed by the learned judge of the court below. We affirm the judgment for the reasons given by him.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lieberman v. ColahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Brown v. QuintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Dodson Coal Co. v. DelanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Burr v. MazerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Washington Steel Form Co. v. North City Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API