Legal Opinion

CHI. & CALUMET DIST. TRANS. CO. v. Vidinghoff

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1952No. 18,197PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

122 Ind. App. 395 (1952)

103 N.E.2d 460

CHICAGO AND CALUMET DISTRICT TRANSIT COMPANY, INC.

v.

VIDINGHOFF.

No. 18,197.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

Filed February 7, 1952.

Rehearing denied March 19, 1952.

Transfer denied May 13, 1952.

Owen W. Crumpacker and Crumpacker & Friedrich, both of Hammond; John K. Ruckelshaus, John C. O'Connor and Ruckelshaus, Reilly, Rhetts & O'Connor, all of Indianapolis, for appellant.

Galvin, Galvin & Leeney, of Hammond, for appellee.

ROYSE, J.

Appellee brought this action against appellant for damages for personal injuries arising out of an accident when she was struck by a…

Also in this document: Dissent · Achor; Dissent · Achor.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gamble v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Larkins v. KohlmeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. LloydIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Pfisterer v. KeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Koplovitz v. JensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frankfort v. OwensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. White v. CrowIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Chicago & Calumet District Transit Co. v. VidinghoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Chicago & Calumet District Transit Co. v. VidinghoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API