Legal Opinion
Chicago & Calumet District Transit Co. v. Vidinghoff
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 1952No. 18,197PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtRoyse, J.
Appellee brought this action against appellant for damages for personal injuries arising out of an accident when she was struck by a bus operated by appellant in the City of Hammond. The material allega*397tions of negligence upon which the cause was submitted to the jury were:
“In failing to maintain a lookout in front of and in the path traveled by the bus which struck this plaintiff,”
“In failing to sound a horn or give any other warning of the approach of the bus which struck this plaintiff,”
“In failing to bring the bus which struck this plaintiff to a stop before the same came into contact…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gamble v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- Shown v. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
- CHI. & CALUMET DIST. TRANS. CO. v. VidinghoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by1 opinion
- CHI. & CALUMET DIST. TRANS. CO. v. VidinghoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952