Legal Opinion

Chicago & Calumet District Transit Co. v. Vidinghoff

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1952No. 18,197PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRoyse, J.

Appellee brought this action against appellant for damages for personal injuries arising out of an accident when she was struck by a bus operated by appellant in the City of Hammond. The material allega*397tions of negligence upon which the cause was submitted to the jury were:

“In failing to maintain a lookout in front of and in the path traveled by the bus which struck this plaintiff,”
“In failing to sound a horn or give any other warning of the approach of the bus which struck this plaintiff,”
“In failing to bring the bus which struck this plaintiff to a stop before the same came into contact…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gamble v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Shown v. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. CHI. & CALUMET DIST. TRANS. CO. v. VidinghoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. CHI. & CALUMET DIST. TRANS. CO. v. VidinghoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API