Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rancho Santa Anita, Inc. v. City of Arcadia

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1942No. L. A. 16964Published

1Dissent

EDMONDS, J., Dissenting.

I agree with the conclusion that the ordinance of the city of Arcadia did not require the city council to follow the requirements of section 3714 of the Political Code in levying its assessment for the fiscal year 1937-38 but, in my opinion, the allegations of the plaintiff’s complaint clearly show that the council levied taxes at a rate designed to produce more revenue than was required for governmental purposes during the ensuing fiscal year and that such levy is void as to the excess.

In considering the validity of a tax levy, the courts will *327consider two important…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. San Christina Investment Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Otis v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Madary v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. RoesslerWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Stuart Arms Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API