People v. Crumble
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The defendant has been convicted of murder in the first degree. The deceased had been his mistress. He admitted he had inflicted the stab wounds that resulted in her death. His only claim was that when this occurred his intelligence was suspended by drunkenness. Accordingly, the trial judge in his charge said to the jury, “ In fact, there is not much dispute here as to what really happened, except as to the mental condition of the defendant at the time that he cut this girl.”
In People v. Leonardi (143 N. Y. 360) we said: “ By our statute deliberation and premeditation are necessary…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. . LeonardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. AgostoNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. AndujasNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. BraleyOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. McCormackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- People v. LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.