Legal Opinion
Rozen v. Redco Corporation
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 28, 1961No. 38768PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
Action in replevin was brought by the Redco Corporation against B. P. Rozen to recover certain “reconditioned” usable oil field pipe and equipment, or the value thereof. The pipe and equipment were allegedly wrongfully taken and detained from the plaintiff by the defendant. The defendant answered by general denial.
Trial by jury resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of the usable pipe and equipment or the value of same in the sum of $2,592.45. This verdict was approved by the trial judge and judgment rendered accordingly, resulting in this appeal.
Defe…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Andrews v. HoeslichWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Bales v. BreedloveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- General Finance Corporation v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Beck v. DaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Harkey v. TillmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Construction Services of Samoa, Inc. v. Bank of HawaiiHigh Court of American Samoa · 2004
- Richards v. Milner Pontiac, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Rozen v. Redco CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961