Legal Opinion

Construction Services of Samoa, Inc. v. Bank of Hawaii

High Court of American Samoa

Decided June 22, 2004No. CA No. 21-02Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs Construction Services of Samoa, Inc. (“CSS”), Mom Mane (“Mom”), and Sallie Mane (“Sallie”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) brought the instant action against Defendants Bank of Hawaii (“BOH”), Tony’s Construction, and Sila Poasa (“Sila”). Plaintiffs seek damages from *195BOH on six counts: (1) conversion; (2) breach of duty to return equipment; (3) breach of duty to notify; (4) breach of duty to account; (5) conversion of funds from bank account; and (6) intentional infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiffs seek damages from Tony’s Construction on two counts: (1)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. A to Z Rental, Inc. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  3. Mercantile Financial Corp. v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Reed v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Andrews v. Mid-America Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API