Legal Opinion

Lopez-Mendoza v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1983No. Nos. 79-7673, 80-7189PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORRIS, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated appeals present the question whether the exclusionary rule bars the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) from using in deportation proceedings evidence obtained by INS officers in violation of the Fourth Amendment. In separate proceedings, appellants were ordered deported under 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(2) on the basis of admissions to immigration officers that they were aliens in this country illegally. At their deportation hearings, both tried unsuccessfully to suppress evidence of their admissions on the ground they were the products of arrests…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Martin Guevara-Martinez, Also Known as Jose Dias-IbarraCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Rene Del Toro Gudino, AKA Rene Del Toro-GudinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. SANTOSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1984
  5. Garrett v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API