Legal Opinion

Alam v. Blinken

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 15, 2024No. 2:24-cv-01103Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MUHAMMAD WAJAHAT ALAM, et al., No. 2:24-cv-01103-DJC-CKD 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 ANTHONY BLINKEN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Defendants move for dismissal or, in the alternative, summary judgment on 19 Plaintiffs’ claims that Defendants have unreasonably delayed adjudication of Plaintiffs’ 20 immigrant visa application. Defendants argue that Plaintiffs’ claims are unreviewable 21 because the application was already reviewed and refused by a consular officer under 22

8 U.S.C. § 1201

(g ), which…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API