Legal Opinion

Fekade v. Lincoln University

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 2001No. CIV. A. 99-6224PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KELLY, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendants, Lincoln University (“the University”), Dr. Delroy Louden (“Louden”) and Dr. Penelope Kinsey (“Kinsey”) (collectively referred to as “the Defendants”). The Plaintiff, Dr. Abeba Fekade, filed suit in this Court alleging national origin discrimination and retaliation. The Defendants now seek summary judgment on her claims. For the following reasons, the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.

I. BACKGROUND

Accepting as true the evidence of the nonmoving party,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Walker v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2004
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. NHS Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. DREW v. WALTONDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. PROVITT v. SERGEANT TANNERDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. PROVITT v. SERGEANT TANNERDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API