Legal Opinion
State v. Lipinski
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 23, 1988No. C7-87-1637PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Darrell Lipinski appeals his conviction of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, claiming his seizure by police violated the fourth amendment. We affirm.
FACTS
At approximately 5:47 p.m. on April 13, 1987, Officer Robert Salonek of the Will-mar City Police Department received a dispatch on his squad car radio. The dispatcher told Officer Salonek that a person identifying himself as a doctor at the Willmar Regional Treatment Center had called in to report that an intoxicated individual had left the treatment center in a red Buick with Minnesota…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Olson v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Appelgate v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jobe v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Playle v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Playle v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989