Legal Opinion

Fuller v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 1, 1931No. 14213Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

In the light of the precedents cited in the original opinion in Fuller v. State, 118 Texas Crim. Rep., 588, 37 S. W. (2d) 1034, namely, Fulshear v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 375, 128 S. W., 134; Pye v. State, 74 Texas Crim. Rep., 322, 171 S. W., S. W., 741; Calentine v. State, 50 Texas Crim. Rep., 154, 94 S. W., 1061; Patrick v. State, 50 Texas Crim. Rep., 496, 98 S. W., 840; Holland v. State, 110 Texas Crim. Rep., 384, 10 S. W. (2d) 561, the opinion is expressed that the description of the property in the indictment is sufficient. Mr. Branch,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dignowitty v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  3. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Pye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Calentine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API