Fuller v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
In the light of the precedents cited in the original opinion in Fuller v. State, 118 Texas Crim. Rep., 588, 37 S. W. (2d) 1034, namely, Fulshear v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 375, 128 S. W., 134; Pye v. State, 74 Texas Crim. Rep., 322, 171 S. W., S. W., 741; Calentine v. State, 50 Texas Crim. Rep., 154, 94 S. W., 1061; Patrick v. State, 50 Texas Crim. Rep., 496, 98 S. W., 840; Holland v. State, 110 Texas Crim. Rep., 384, 10 S. W. (2d) 561, the opinion is expressed that the description of the property in the indictment is sufficient. Mr. Branch,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dignowitty v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Pye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Calentine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.