Legal Opinion

Pye v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 25, 1913No. 2448PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was charged in the first count with the theft of one vendor's lien note for the payment of eight thousand dollars and being of the value of eight thousand dollars; and in the second count charged with embezzlement of the note.

The indictment is attacked because it does not sufficiently describe the note. The indictment charges in both counts the note to be, "One vendor's lien note for the payment of eight thousand dollars and of the value of eight thousand dollars." It is contended the indictment is not sufficient in that the description of the note was not as demanded by the terms…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  3. Hargrove v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  4. Winters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Luce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Sasse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. State v. DitzelWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API