Calentine v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states- the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Judge.
Appellant made a motion to quash the complaint and information, among other things because the same does not sufficiently describe the property alleged to have been stolen. The property alleged to have been stolen is a promissory note of the value of $31.80, but it is not alleged by whom the note was executed, nor is the amount of the note stated, or its face value, the date of its execution or the date of its maturity, nor the date when it was made payable; nor do the complaint and information contain any matters of description which would enable defendant to plead either an…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Worsham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Luce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Pye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Moody v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.