Nielssen v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is robbery by assault with a prior conviction for an offense of the same nature alleged for enhancement under Article 62, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.; the punishment, life.
Appellant’s first ground of error is that the court permitted the injured party to identify appellant as the robber, because even though he had not witnessed a lineup, his son and daughter-in-law had been at the lineup; they came home, and told him that they had identified, “The man that was there.” The witness had ample opportunity to identify appellant both before he entered the house, and while…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- George W. Bates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- United States v. William Edward Zeiler, United States of America v. William Edward Zeiler, Richard Peter Chiocca, William Edward ZeilerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Norman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Thai Ngoc Nguyen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Holcomb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.