Legal Opinion

David D. Beck, A/K/A Dave Beck v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 14, 1962No. 16424_1PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

The taxability of embezzled funds has been the subject of legal dispute for several years. This court in 1945, under certain limited facts, 1 held that when an embezzler takes money from an employer with no conceivable claim or colorable claim of right to it, it at no time becomes a taxable “gain” or “profit” or “income” to the embezzler, within the definition of “gross income” as defined in Section 22 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 (26 U.S.C. § 22). Wilcox v. Commissioner, 9 Cir. 1945, 148 F.2d 933. This court agreed with the fifth circuit opinion of McKnight v.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. United States v. Arthur J. PorthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. Paul A. Gorin v. United States of America, Henry Grillo v. United States of America, Saul Glassman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
  3. Estate of Beck v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  4. Gordon Arthur Lyda and Albert Francis Perrault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. J. Norman JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API