Legal Opinion
Ott v. AlliedSignal, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 19, 2005No. 02A04-0409-CV-526PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Shirley Ott, for herself and as personal representative of the estate of her late husband, Jerome Ott, maintains this action against several companies that now or previously produced or sold asbestos or asbestos-containing products to Jerome's employers, contending that occupational asbestos exposure caused his lung cancer 1 In a previous appeal, our supreme court concluded that applying the products liability statute of repose could raise a constitutional issue with respect to Ott's claims and remanded the matter to the trial court for relevant fact finding.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Simmons v. Pacor, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Carlberg Ex Rel. CarlbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Farley v. Hammond Sanitary DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Adams v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
- Baker v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
- Barbee v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
- Farley v. Hammond Sanitary DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.