Legal Opinion

Farley v. Hammond Sanitary District

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 2011No. 45A05-1008-CT-481PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARTEAU, Senior Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Katherine Farley and James Paul, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (collectively, “Farley and Paul”), appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee Hammond Sanitary District (“HSD”). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

ISSUES

Farley and Paul raise three issues, which we restate as:

I. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by striking portions of an expert witness’ affidavit that Farley and Paul submitted in opposition to HSD’s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment.

II. Whether…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Peavler v. BD. OF COM'RS MONROE CTY.Indiana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Merrill v. Knauf Fiber Glass GmbHIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Kopczynski Ex Rel. Palmer v. BargersIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Scott v. City of SeymourIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Meyer v. Marine Builders, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robert E. Redington v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Brian L. Boyland, Jennifer K. Boyland v. Kenneth Hedge (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Farley v. Hammond Sanitary DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Robert E. Redington v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API