Legal Opinion

Ventresca v. Ventresca

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1956No. Appeal, 134PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

The lower court confined to damages the remedy for a deliberate violation of a deed restriction which prohibited the erection of any building within five feet of the side lines of a lot. The defendants built a garage approximately three feet four inches from the side line which divided plaintiff’s and defendants’ properties. The plaintiff appealed.

The lower court found that soon after the excavation for the garage was visible the plaintiff made oral protests and objections to the defendants and on various occasions thereafter repeated his objections; that the garage was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Price v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. McGee v. SINGLEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Hamilton v. FosterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Kanefsky v. Dratch Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Korona v. Bensalem TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Louis W. Epstein Family Partnership Levitz Furniture Corporation, Intervenor in D.C. v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Moyerman v. GlanzbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Peters v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Gey v. BeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Wear-Ever Aluminum, Inc. v. TOWNECRAFT, ETC, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API