Legal Opinion
Adrienne Dilworth v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 12, 2005No. 04-2480PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter arises from a dispute regarding alleged misrepresentations made to the plaintiff-appellant, Adrienne Dil-worth, when she purchased a life insurance policy from the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (hereinafter called “Met-Life”) to insure her nine-year old daughter, Aisha Sharif. In particular, Dilworth asserted claims predicated on negligence, common law fraud and deceit, violation of the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, Pa. Stat. Ann. tit. 73, § 201-1 (West 1993) (hereinafter called…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Johnson v. KnorrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Couden v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Elliott & Frantz, Inc. v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Stanziale v. Pepper Hamilton LLP (In Re Student Finance Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- Usx Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Usx Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.