Carlow v. C. Aultman & Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Fillmore county. Tried below before Morris, J. cited: Rosenjield v. Chada, 10 Neb., 421; Lawson v. Gibson, 18 Id., 137; Coelde Separator Co. v. Clark, 23 Id., 702; Kansas Mfg. Co. v. Gandy, 10 Id., 83; State Savings Bankv.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Fillmore county. Tried below before Morris, J. cited: Rosenjield v. Chada, 10 Neb., 421; Lawson v. Gibson, 18 Id., 137; Coelde Separator Co. v. Clark, 23 Id., 702; Kansas Mfg. Co. v. Gandy, 10 Id., 83; State Savings Bankv. Scott, 11 Id., 448; Mwndy v. Whittemore, 15 Id., 650; Schouler, Husband and Wife, sec. 260, and cases cited in N. 1, p. 307; Willard, Equity, 650. cited: Pope v. Hooper j 6 Neb., 178; Thompson v. Sharp, 17 Id., 69; Wyant v. Tuthill, Id., 495; Messenger v. State, 25 Id., 674; Simmons Hardware Co. v. Brokaw, 7 Id., 405; Hapgood v. Ellis, 11…
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
On the 8th day of April, 1886, Frederick Curtis commenced a suit in the district court of Fillmore county, Nebraska, to foreclose a mortgage upon the south half of the southwest quarter of section fourteen (14), township five (5), range three (3) west, given to secure a note in the sum of one hundred and sixty dollars ($160), executed by Josephine Carlow and Charles H. Carlow. C. S. Cleveland and C. Aultman & Co. were made parties defendant. Personal service was had upon the Carlows, and they were required to answer by the 10th day of May, 1886. Service was made by publication upon C. Aultman…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hapgood & Co. v. EllisNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by41 opinions
- Wunderle v. WunderleIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Weber v. KirkendallNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Nebraska Power Co. v. KoenigNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
- Chattanooga, R. & C. R. v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- American Building & Loan Ass'n v. RainboltNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.