Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Citizens' Bank of Haynesville

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1925No. 6966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, District Judge.

The Citizens’ Bank of Haynesville, La. (hereinafter called plaintiff), brought this action against J. B. Shaw, J. O. Van.ee, and M. F. Scott (hereinafter called defendants), upon a promissory note dated September 29, 1920, executed by the defendants and S. T. Wisby and J. F. Whitlock, payable to the order of the Trinity Drilling Company of Texas (hereinafter called Drilling Company) for the principal sum of $12,600, due 60 days after date, with interest from maturity at 6 per cent, pen annum.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendants in the court below…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pastene v. PardiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Gleason v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Portuguese American Bank v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Sharpless v. GiffenNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Deaver v. DillardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pappas v. CourembisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. McNamara v. Infusion Software IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  3. Pacific National Bank v. HernreichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  4. Pacific National Bank v. HernreichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Pittman v. Food Safety Net Services LimitedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API