Legal Opinion

McNamara v. Infusion Software Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 21, 2020No. 2:17-cv-04026Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Mary M cNamara, Individually, and on ) No. CV-17-04026-PHX-SPL ) 9 Behalf of All Other Similarly Situated, ) 10 ) O R D E R Plaintiffs, ) ) 11 vs. ) ) 12 Infusion Software, Inc., et al., ) 13 ) ) 14 Defendants. ) 15 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. (Doc. 254) 16 Defendants oppose the Motion on several grounds. (Doc. 257) The Motion is fully briefed 17 and for the reasons that follow, the Motion will be granted in part.1 18 Plaintiff brought a collective action alleging…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API