Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Food Safety Net Services Limited

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided February 8, 2022No. 2:20-cv-01879Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Eddie LaReece Pittman, No. CV-20-01879-PHX-GMS 10 Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER 11 v. (Amended to reflect correct dismissal date on page Six) 12 Food Safety Net Services Limited, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Pending before the Court is Food Safety Net Services Limited’s (“Defendant”) 17 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Doc. 26). For the reasons below, 18 Defendant’s Motion is granted. 19 BACKGROUND 20 Plaintiff filed a Complaint alleging violations of

42 U.S.C. § 1981

on September 25, 21 2020. (Doc.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. John Doe v. United States of America, in Re John Doe, Debtor. John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Sonoma County Ass'n of Retired Employees v. Sonoma CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Lukovsky v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Seitzinger v. Reading Hosp. and Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API