Legal Opinion

Wolff v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 11, 1911No. 175PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Transferred from United States Circuit Court, Eastern District of Louisiana, G. A. 6888 (T. D. 29628).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

On April 18, 1907, 1,000 rolls of fancy, superfine, 116 warp Chinese matting, measuring some 40,000 square yards, was exported from *182China to the United States and arrived in New Orleans in June, 1907. The goods were valued in the consular invoice at 20 cents Hongkong currency per square yard, less nondutiable charges and the usual discount of 2 per cent. The local appraiser at New Orleans advanced the value to 23 cents per square yard, in the same currency, less discount and nondutiable charges.

It appears from the evidence in the case that the local appraiser was induced to make this advance…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Auffmordt v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. United States v. PassavantSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Robertson v. Frank Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Muser v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. Igstaedter & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  3. United States v. McConnaughey & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. Frank & LambertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. United States v. Bennett & LoewenthalCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API