Legal Opinion
United States v. Lynch
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 10, 1997No. 95 Civ. 9223 (JES)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge:
The Government brings the above-captioned criminal contempt proceeding against defendants George Lynch and Christopher Moscinski. For the reasons that follow, the Court finds defendants not guilty.
BACKGROUND
The following facts, as set forth in a stipulation signed by the parties, are undisputed. See Stipulation (“Stip.”) (undated) attached to Government’s Letter Brief dated November 5, 1996, and submitted to the Court at the Trial held on October 15,1996.
On February 23,1996, the Court entered a permanent injunction in United States v. Lynch…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Paul Jolly v. Thomas Coughlin, Robert Greifinger, John P. Keane, C. Greiner, S. KapoorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. SissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. George Lynch and Christopher MoscinskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- People v. DouglasNew York Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. George Lynch and Christopher MoscinskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. George Lynch and Christopher MoscinskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. George Lynch and Christopher MoscinskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.