Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. George Lynch and Christopher Moscinski

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 14, 1998No. 18, Docket 97-1092Published

1ConcurrenceSack, Circuit Judge

I concur in the opinion of the Court and accept its reasoning. I am convinced that we are forbidden to hear the substantive issues that the government seeks to appeal. Because of their importance, however, I write separately to offer some additional observations as to why I think we cannot hear them. Under the Criminal Appeals Act of 1970, read in the light of the history and purpose of the Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy Clause, we must decline the government’s invitation, in effect, to retry the defendants in this Court on the record and opinion below.

In dismissing the government’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API