United States v. George Lynch and Christopher Moscinski
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
It is further noted that a request for an en banc vote having been made by a judge of the panel that heard the appeal, and a poll of the judges in regular active service having been taken and there being no majority in favor thereof, rehearing en banc is DENIED. Judges Kearse, Leval, Ca-branes, Parker, Pooler, and Sotomayor dissent from the denial of en banc reconsideration.
2ConcurrenceSack, Circuit Judge
My views with respect to this appeal are set forth in my opinion concurring in the majority opinion of the panel, United States v. Lynch, 162 F.3d 732, 736 (2d Cir.1998). “Willfulness” is an element of the crime with which…
3Cases cited20 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Eusebio Salazar, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017