Legal Opinion

Pepe v. Maklansky

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 13, 1999No. 97 Civ. 5778(RMB)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BERMAN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Defendants, Dr. Daniel Maklansky, Dr. Gerald Kurzban, Dr. Barry Bersen, Dr. Burton Cohen, Dr. Howard Guinther, Dr. Alan Hyman, Dr. G. Zimmer, and Maklan-sky, Grunther, Kurzban, Cohen, Zimmer, Hyman & Berson, M.D., P.C. (“Maklansky P.C.”) have filed a motion in limine seeking an order to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and punitive damages against all Defendants, as well as all of Plaintiffs’ claims against the corporate defendant Maklan-sky P.C. Plaintiffs have opposed the motion.

For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Howell v. New York Post Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Riviello v. WaldronNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Bender v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Richard Gallose v. Long Island Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Ponticelli v. Zurich American Insurance GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cowan v. City of Mount VernonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Biberaj v. Pritchard Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Crews v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  4. In Re Mtbe Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  5. Fournier v. EricksonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API