Legal Opinion

Gray v. Lahl

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1978No. TC A 7603 03638, SC 25363PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries resulting from a rear-end automobile collision. Plaintiff’s complaint alleged that defendants were negligent with respect to control, as well as lookout and speed. Defendants’ answer was a general denial. At the conclusion of the trial plaintiff moved for a directed verdict on the issue of liability. That motion was denied. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment on that verdict.

Plaintiff contends that this is one of those "rare cases” in which plaintiff was entitled to a directed verdict on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnum v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Raz v. MillsOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Weitzel v. WingardOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Pitcher v. LeathersOregon Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. TylerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Cervantes v. MattsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API