Legal Opinion

Raz v. Mills

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1962PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

This is an action for damages suffered in a collision between two automobiles. The jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the ensuing judgment.

The plaintiff, Eileen Raz, was riding as a passenger in an automobile being driven by her husband in a northeasterly direction on Highway 99-W. The defendant, Ruth Mills, was driving a pickup truck on said Mghway in a southwesterly direction. The complaint alleges that the defendant negligently caused *223the pickup truck to collide with the Raz automobile, causing serious injuries to plaintiff. The specifications of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tuite v. UNION PACIFIC STAGESOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Powell v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Gum v. WoogeOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. McReynolds v. HowlandOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Phillips v. CreightonOregon Supreme Court · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Fenton v. AleshireOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Barnum v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. McConnell v. HerronOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Friederich v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. State v. JamesOregon Supreme Court · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API