Legal Opinion

Burkhalter v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 4, 1997No. CR 96-278PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

The appellant, Craig Henry Burkhalter, was convicted of rape, sexual abuse in the first degree, and violation of a minor in the first degree. On appeal, Burkhalter contends that his convictions must be reversed due to juror misconduct. We find no merit to this argument, and accordingly, we affirm.

During the trial, the victim testified that starting when she was seven years old until she reached the age of fifteen, Burkhalter performed various sexual acts on her. Portions of the victim’s testimony were corroborated by a neighbor who witnessed and participated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McGhee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Winters v. EldersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Odum v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Black v. Van SteenwykSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Doyle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Black v. Van SteenwykSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API