Legal Opinion

Valeo Schalter und Sensoren GmbH v. NVIDIA Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 6, 2025No. 5:23-cv-05721Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 VALEO SCHALTER UND SENSOREN Case No. 23-cv-05721-EKL (VKD) GMBH, 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 10 DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION 11 OF INVESTIGATION DOCUMENTS NVIDIA CORPORATION, 12 Re: Dkt. No. 92 Defendant. 13 14 Plaintiff Valeo Schalter und Sensoren GmbH (“Valeo”) moves for an order compelling 15 defendant NVIDIA Corporation (“NVIDIA”) to produce certain documents NVIDIA claims are 16 protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and/or the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lawrence S. Bittaker v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison of San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Chevron Corp. v. Pennzoil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Curtis R. Martin, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API