Legal Opinion

State v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1891PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Ingham. (Peck, J.) Bill to remove cloud from title, for an injunction, and an accounting. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The bill of complaint in this case, which is on the information of the Attorney General, prays for an injunction to restrain the defendants, first, — ■

“From sales of any of the lands described in said Exhibit A, or from selling any timber upon said lands, or committing any waste, either directly or by their agents, and from asserting and claiming any title to said lands and premises; and that the title of the State of Michigan in and to said lands, under and by virtue of the land grant of the Congress of the United States, made September 28, 1850, may be decreed and declared to be full,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tucker v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  2. Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. State ex rel. Caldwell v. Lincoln Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State v. HorrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API